Asked on August 2, 2026
Humanity survives, but all wild animals vanish forever. Acceptable?
Yes — humans come first
34%
No — that world isn't worth it
66%
Comments
6 comments from that day
PatrickKline88
humans first obviously
0
GiselleM_tech
Agriculture alone would fail. No pollinators, no seed dispersal, no pest control. We'd starve within years even if we won the vote.
0
DominicRoss
If it's truly choose between humans vanishing or animals vanishing, I pick humans. We've had our chance.
0
YvonneLucas_
Yeah sure let's just cement ourselves as the only life form and see how that works out lol
0
SethGraves88
Without ecosystems we collapse anyway. Humans depend on pollination, oxygen production, nutrient cycles. This isn't survival, it's slow extinction.
0
IsabellaRay_
This is basically asking if we should become the only species that matters. Hard no from me.
0
More questions
- City parks: kept wild and tangled, or manicured and neat?
- Scarce water, many claimants: divide equally or by need?
- A rocket facility replaces coastal marshland. Progress price, or price too high?
- Record heat again. Accept the new normal, or keep fighting to reverse it?
- Wild land stays wild, or feeds the people who need it?