Asked on September 21, 2026
A rocket facility replaces coastal marshland. Progress price, or price too high?
Worth it for what space unlocks
22%
Some ground must stay wild
78%
Comments
6 comments from that day
IA
IanaMuller_indie
Why are these always false choices? Find another site that doesn't destroy habitat.
0
RI
RidleyPark88
Space industry creates jobs and opens new frontiers. Marshes regenerate elsewhere or can be managed around the facility.
0
JA
JasperThorn_indie
Every ecosystem lost is gone forever. We've got enough concrete already.
0
NO
NormaShaw_local
My grandkids need nature more than another launch pad.
0
CA
CaseyLemur88
Space exploration funds future tech that solves climate. Both matter but timing counts.
0
MO
MorganSteel_tech
Marshlands are irreplaceable carbon sinks. We can launch rockets from existing sites.
0
More questions
- Greenhouse gases hit another record, and I'm still rinsing yoghurt pots for recycling?
- City parks: kept wild and tangled, or manicured and neat?
- Scarce water, many claimants: divide equally or by need?
- Record heat again. Accept the new normal, or keep fighting to reverse it?
- Wild land stays wild, or feeds the people who need it?