When it comes to ending the war in Ukraine, which approach do you think is more likely to bring lasting peace?

Central Europe understands the threat better than Western Europe. Military support is the only language Russia understands.

The world has bigger problems — hunger, climate. This war is draining global resources that could save millions.

Norway fully supports Ukraine. Peace through strength, not surrender.

From Romania — we share a border with Ukraine. A weak peace deal is a threat to all of us in the region.

India has always stood for non-violence and dialogue. War solves nothing in the long run.

Watching from Australia — hard to imagine what Ukrainians go through daily. I voted for military support but I understand both sides.

Slava Ukraine!!!

Germany has been through enough wars. Diplomacy is always the answer, even if it takes longer.

Easy to talk about ceasefire when it's not your home being bombed. We fight until every inch is free.

History shows that appeasement never works. Support Ukraine fully.

Both sides have suffered too much. A negotiated peace is the only realistic path forward.

As a Pole, I know what Russian "peace" looks like. Keep fighting Ukraine, we stand with you.

From Japan — we also had territorial disputes for decades. Sometimes a frozen conflict is better than endless war.

The economic damage to all of Europe is unsustainable. France wants peace now.

Sovereignty is not negotiable. No compromise on our land.

I respect Ukraine's position but the human cost is devastating. Hard to know what's right from the outside.

Turkey has been trying to mediate from the start. Diplomacy is the only way this ends.

We know what it means to fight for survival. You cannot negotiate with an aggressor who doesn't respect agreements.

Italy is exhausted by this conflict. Energy prices, refugees, instability. Peace at any cost.

My brother is at the front. Don't tell me to accept a ceasefire. He fights for all of us.