Asked on June 13, 2026
Should the US pursue diplomacy or continue military strikes to resolve the conflict with Iran?
Continue military strikes
44%
Pursue diplomatic negotiations
56%
Comments
6 comments from that day
GlobalMind_88
We've tried military intervention before and it only destabilizes the region further. Diplomacy might be slower, but it's the only path to lasting peace.
0
kyiv_thinker
Military strength sometimes forces the other side to the negotiating table. Without showing we're willing to act, diplomacy becomes meaningless.
0
Andrew211
Both approaches have failed in the past. But continuing strikes will only create more extremists and suffering for innocent people.
0
Marmalin
As Europeans, we've seen what happens when military escalation takes over. Diplomacy is always preferable, even when it's difficult and slow.
0
mumbai_speaks
The US needs to show it means business. Iran won't respect empty talk.
0
TokyoObserver
Diplomacy requires patience and trust-building, which is why we need to start immediately before the situation becomes irreversible.
0
More questions
- Sanctions on a hostile nation: target the regime or ordinary people pay the price?
- A small nation joins a powerful alliance. Gained security, or lost independence?
- A foreign military base on your soil: protection or occupation?
- Disputed land: the residents decide, or history decides?
- When a country won't negotiate, squeeze its economy or keep talking?