Asked on June 13, 2026
Should the US pursue diplomacy or continue military strikes to resolve the conflict with Iran?
Continue military strikes
38%
Pursue diplomatic negotiations
62%
Comments
6 comments from that day
GlobalMind_88
6/13/2026, 6:54:20 AM
We've tried military intervention before and it only destabilizes the region further. Diplomacy might be slower, but it's the only path to lasting peace.
0
kyiv_thinker
6/13/2026, 6:58:12 AM
Military strength sometimes forces the other side to the negotiating table. Without showing we're willing to act, diplomacy becomes meaningless.
0
Andrew211
6/13/2026, 7:36:04 AM
Both approaches have failed in the past. But continuing strikes will only create more extremists and suffering for innocent people.
0
Marmalin
6/13/2026, 7:38:34 AM
As Europeans, we've seen what happens when military escalation takes over. Diplomacy is always preferable, even when it's difficult and slow.
0
mumbai_speaks
6/13/2026, 7:49:52 AM
The US needs to show it means business. Iran won't respect empty talk.
0
TokyoObserver
6/13/2026, 8:01:29 AM
Diplomacy requires patience and trust-building, which is why we need to start immediately before the situation becomes irreversible.
0
More questions
- When a country won't negotiate, squeeze its economy or keep talking?
- A country overwhelmed at its border: close it or keep it open?
- Your enemy loses a child. Do you mourn with them?
- An enemy offers peace. You don't trust them. Do you still talk?
- Your country is wrong in a conflict. Do you still defend it?